Climate science: Spin, science and climate change | The Economist

    from the page:

    Insuring against catastrophe
    Plenty of uncertainty remains; but that argues for, not against, action. If it were known that global warming would be limited to 2°C, the world might decide to live with that. But the range of possible outcomes is huge, with catastrophe one possibility, and the costs of averting climate change are comparatively small. Just as a householder pays a small premium to protect himself against disaster, the world should do the same.

    Now some know me as an inveterate optimist, and I’m normally skeptical about exaggerated scientific claims in popular media, but if it comes down to a choice between averting potential environmental disaster and penny-pinching to satisfy a privileged few, well…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s